EdTech 541 My final thoughts

Part 1

I can’t type that title without hearing the classic 80’s rock theme, ‘The Final Countdown’ by Europe. It makes me smile and so did this class. I always reflect on my learning and always seem to start with the fact that I have learned so much. I think that is a good thing.

I learned a lot this term about how and why I should try to integrate technology into my classes. I also learned a few life lessons too. I fell behind at one point in the course due to some hurdles outside of school and work. I struggled to keep up. For the first time since starting this Masters, I really struggled. I was ready to pack it in, imagining that I wouldn’t be able to get caught up. I actually dropped my other class. I haven’t ever failed at anything academically before so it was a big ego bash. I was reminded what it is like to be in a 5th grade class again. To be a student who is struggling, stressed and worried.

I had some great advice and remembered that the learning is what is key, not the grades. I managed to get back on track with this class, albeit late with several posts and assignments.They got finished though and to the best of my ability. I think what I am trying to articulate is that the learning which impacted me most this semester was about myself, studying, life and the big picture. That is not to say that I have not learned lots about integrating technology into my lessons. I have.

I have learned that integrating tech is a process which has to be thought out and evaluated. Instead of finding a great tool and deciding to use it in class, I will now evaluate it and see if it is the right tool to use. I have also learned that I can integrate and use technology to help me develop more cross-curricular lessons and making learning more valuable. I have always understood the power of feedback to pupils but now I am looking for ways to make sure they get better quality and more instant feedback – something technology can help me to provide.

In developing the projects and activities which I did, I tried to keep as open a mind as possible to different learning theories and pedagogies. I would say that constructivism played a big part in my thinking – coming up with activities that students could form their own learning from. I think my activities have always tried to involve some aspect of social learning and have occasionally included some Experiential activities. There aspects of more traditional behavioralism in there as part of different lesson plans. I have always felt that balance wins out in every situation and hopefully my projects and lessons reflect that.

In our summer semester at school, we spend some time studying American history and so I hope that the resources which I made will all be used directly by my pupils – that was certainly the intention. One area which has had an impact already is game-based learning. Following our unit, I experimented by downloading the award winning game 80 days and have been using it with a group of reluctant writers in my class to see if it can help to spark their imaginations. It appears to be working at the moment.

Because I am in the M.E.T program I have to complete a final portfolio which demonstrates that the artifacts I created over my time on the course satisfy the AECT standards. I am confident that the projects which I made go part way to satisfying some of these requirements.

Standard 1 is Content Knowledge. I feel the artifacts which I made are all evidence of Creating, Using and Assessing/Evaluating as described by the standard indicators. Those which had accompanying lesson plans in particular showed clear selection and thought in their creation and development. There is variety in the activities I planned and student learning lies at the heart of all the activities.

Standard 2 is Content Pedagogy. Here I think that I met the standard but less than Standard 1. I tried to use and implement a number of the different lessons in class as I went along. Often asking pupils for feedback on tools and ideas that I was looking at. The projects which I designed were thought out after reading of course materials  and so while the impact of those pedagogies is harder to specify, the work of Roblyer in particular impacted my work.

Standard 3 is Learning Environments. Again I think that the artifacts which I created fall under the categories of Creating, Using and Assessing/ Evaluating. As the course was about  implementing and embedding technology in the classroom, the vast majority of the work I did was informed by these standards, reflecting on the way lessons would work in the class to foster effective learning.

Standard 4 is Professional Knowledge and Skills. Reading the ideas and thoughts of my peers and responding to their feedback was important. Being able to collaborate and share (although I didn’t do it as well as I have in the past) helped me to develop and improve the design of my instruction and reflect on my work. I often worked with teachers at my school to run ideas by them and ask for their input. Collaborative practice was probably the indicator which I met the most. I did reflect a lot on the feedback given to me as well as  thinking about the artifacts I made.

I think the majority of the lessons and projects which I created helped me to satisfy these 4 Standards to varying degrees. Sometimes I am hard on myself and struggle to accept that I have actually achieved what I supposed to.

Part 2

In evaluating my blogging this semester, I think I have performed poorly in compassion to other classes. Overall, I think I started out pretty strongly and finished well but had a dip in the latter part of the Semester. In using the Grading rubric, I would rate my own performance as follows:

  • Content: Proficient with some outstanding (although I don’t like that word!) My early posts and my final ones came from a lot of thought and always with personal reflection. The content was probably my strongest area. 60 points.
  • Readings: I read fully, and looked for other readings to support my learning. In the vast majority of posts I used APA citations  – but they were not always extensive and sometimes limited to the Roblyer text. 15 points
  • Timeliness: Not good. I got into a routine of working Sundays as that was the only day I had time and this meant late posts. I never caught up or got ahead and so I think I fall into the Basic category at best. I did manage to get them all done and put a lot of thought into what I wrote, making them real and as good as possible is hopefully better than quick. That said I would give myself no more than 5 points.
  • I always tried to make at least two comments and sometimes more. I always commented on others’ blogs so that the comments would last. When I fell behind with my own blogs, I fell behind with commenting my peers blogs as well. I did always try to ask a question, or relate a post to my own situation and thinking – engaging in debate as much as possible. I made sure I always replied to comments made on my blog. 25 points.

So that is it, my final words are reflective which is how I started this course. Full circle. As I said at the start, I struggled for part of this course due to some circumstances beyond my control. I did catch up and think I finished strongly. I am proud of the projects which I created and know they will help me in school. An enjoyable class which I know will impact my work and student learning. Thanks to everyone who helped me out.

Andrew

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Relative Advantages Chart

We have completed a number of tasks for EdTech 541 so far and I seem to have been struggling. I am not sure why. I think I got off to a slow start and have been catching up. Taking two classes and working full time sometimes just creeps up on you.

One of the activities this week was to create a chart which looked at the relative advantages of embedding and using Educational Technology in class. I was stumped with this at first and am really not sure that I have done a good job. My original area for focus was 5th Grade computing but this task seemed moot with that as a focus. We have to use technology to teach computing and so I tried to think outside the box a little. I completed my chart for Social Sciences in my school instead.

I focused on Geography and History which make up part of our the International Primary Curriculum which we use in school. I hope this shift is ok – the result was I had to really think about ways in which my current learning goals would benefit from embedding technology and it worked. My research led me to a number of tools I had not come across as well as thinking about how to use tools we currently have in different ways.

The chart I created is below. Have a look and feel free to add any comments. I think there is a lot to improve but I also feel the process was good and I had some real world take away from the activity.